Writing Statement of Purpose (SoP) for a post graduate research or Doctoral studies or PhD is different in context than writing SoP for an undergraduate program. Typically, while writing for an UG program, students are encouraged to paint a vivid picture of what they were like growing up, and how that made them the person they are today. But in a Ph.D. program it is not advisable to do that and people usually expect you to focus more on your research interest and academic background.
Here’s is a sample Statement of Purpose:
``My ultimate goal is to complete my doctorate so that I can teach future teachers, conduct research within the classroom, and make a contribution to the improvement of mathematics education. Over the past fifteen years, my journey towards this goal has been circuitous at best. It has carried me through many schools and multiple states, presenting opportunities to work within every grade from kindergarten to college. My compass has guided me to discover methods to improve my craft as a teacher and the role that research plays toward that end.
Writings such as The Teaching Gap, by Stigler and Hiebert (1999), helped fuel this interest. Ideas such as the lesson study model and others provided the chance for me to focus my pedagogical lens. Collaboration with pre-service and practicing teachers helped me see the need to bring research back to the classroom and to lead teachers toward a better understanding of math. By completing a doctorate, I plan to improve my own proficiency in mathematics and math education so that I can help bridge the gap between research and practice.
As an educator, one hopes to continually make decisions that positively impact student learning. Researchers hope that this decision-making process includes the ideas and lessons learned from educational research. Practitioners realize that there are myriad decisions to make every day, ranging from curricular choices, to classroom management, to assessment strategies, to choices of presentation and pacing that address different learners. The demand to simultaneously manage all of these decisions in a thoughtful, reflective manner requires more time than is available. First-year teachers are often so overwhelmed that mere survival is considered a victory. More experienced teachers hone their skills in the hopes of focusing their energy on decisions that have the greatest impact on student outcomes. So how does educational research impact the majority of current teacher practices? Unfortunately, many practitioners indicate there is little to no impact at all.
For many teachers, research does not seem to factor into their decision-making process. Dr. Judith Sowder (2000) writes, “Many teachers and policy makers believe that most research has little relevance to the decisions they must make” (p. 106). Research is often seen as impractical or written in a form that is not accessible to many teachers. Sowder cites an article by Kennedy (1997) in Educational Researcher, stating that teachers often feel research does not answer the questions they have; nor does it adequately consider their constraints. All of these hurdles limit the connection between research and practice.
During my tenure as a math department chair and as a district math resource teacher, I found this aversion to research a prevailing mindset. Less experienced teachers were often so overwhelmed with the daily pace that they simply wanted tips on classroom management and survival techniques. More experienced teachers usually resisted using research for one of three main reasons. First, they had endured too many poorly run professional development activities in which research seemed impractical. Second, they felt their “curricular tool bag” was full, and they no longer needed to grow pedagogically for their students to achieve. Lastly, even if they felt they might benefit, they often felt overwhelmed by the amount of material to wade through and underwhelmed by the resources they had to assist them in the cause.
If math educators value research and hope to make a positive impact on student learning from the Results they achieve, then they must find a way to help practicing and future teachers see research as relevant to the choices they make. My experience in graduate school reinforced my desire to help bridge this gap between teachers and research. Through my work with pre-service teachers, I was able to create the norm of using research to guide instruction. I saw the benefit of exposing future teachers not only to research findings, but also to ideas that might help shape their own conceptual understanding of mathematics. My interactions during this time, both with pre-service teachers and their mentors, reinforced my belief that greater understanding of mathematical proficiency is required from teachers before adequate gains in students’ mathematical skills can be achieved.
We hope that our students will gain a proficient understanding of mathematics. Yet to afford this opportunity, we expect our teachers to comprehend what mathematical proficiency means. In Adding It Up (2001), Kilpatrick, Swafford, and Findell describe this proficiency as containing five different components: conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, adaptive reasoning, and productive disposition. Exploring these ideas with teachers, I realized that many considered proficiency simply to mean procedural competency.
Paul Tough, in his book Whatever it Takes (2008), describes the approach taken by Geoffrey Canada, a social activist, who felt driven to break the cycle of poverty for children in Harlem. As the president and CEO of the Harlem Children’s Zone, Canada has taken the radical approach of trying to change everything in these children’s lives, starting with how parents interact with their children during the first three years of life. As documented in the book, one of the biggest factors that influence the future success of these children is the amount of time their parents spend reading to them. This early exposure to reading pays incredibly large dividends toward their future readiness and success in school. I believe this same early exposure can transfer from toddlers to teachers. We need to improve the connection between research and practice, and this connection needs to be instilled early.
I believe in starting at inception as well, and inception for teachers begins during their pre-service college experience. I hope to find ways to help teachers utilize and improve their pedagogical content knowledge. If norms can be created with pre-service teachers that help them link ideas from research to facilitating their success in the classroom, then it is possible that research can become a regular resource for problem solving. Simply put, I realize the benefit of research in education and I am ready to start building the bridge.’’